Benchmarks: PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
De prestaties van de Reno 8 Pro in PCMark for Androids Storage zijn niet bijzonder. De realme en Xiaomi POCO met dezelfde chip scoren hier beter.
| Merk /Model | Score |
|---|---|
| TCL 30 Plus (Mediatek Helio G37) | 8783 |
| TCL 20L+ (Qualcomm Snapdragon 662) | 10595 |
| TCL 20 R 5G (Mediatek Dimensity 700) | 13800 |
| Vivo Y76 (MediaTek Dimensity 700) | 14870 |
| OPPO A76 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) | 16982 |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite (Qualcomm SnapDragon 695) | 17776 |
| Xiaomi POCO X3 Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 860) | 19367 |
| OPPO Find X5 Lite (Mediatek Dimensity 900) | 20254 |
| Xiaomi POCO F4 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 870) | 20618 |
| OnePlus Nord 2 CE (Mediatek Dimensity 900) | 20928 |
| OPPO Reno 6 (Mediatek Dimensity 900) | 21014 |
| realme GT Master Edition (Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G) | 21601 |
| OPPO Find X5 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 888) | 22472 |
| OnePlus 10T (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ gen 1) | 23891 |
| OPPO Reno 6 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 870G) | 24469 |
| OnePlus Nord 2 (Mediatek Dimensity 1200) | 25014 |
| Xiaomi 12 (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1) | 25149 |
| OPPO Find X5 Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 8 gen 1) | 25613 |
| ZTE Nubia RedMagic 7S Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ gen 1) | 26480 |
| Xiaomi 12 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1) | 27211 |
| OPPO Reno 8 Pro (Mediatek Dimensity 8100) | 27529 |
| OnePlus 10 Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 8 gen 1) | 27575 |
| realme GT Neo 3T (Qualcomm Snapdragon 870) | 28198 |
| Vivo X80 Pro (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1) | 28553 |
| Xiaomi POCO F4 GT (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 gen 1) | 29280 |
| Xiaomi POCO X4 GT (MediaTek Dimensity 8100) | 29299 |
| Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Samsung Exynos 2200) | 31243 |
| Huawei P50 Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 888) | 31427 |
| ZTE Nubia RedMagic 6S Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 888+) | 33557 |
| Nothing Phone (1) (Qualcomm SnapDragon 778G) | 33999 |
| ZTE Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro (Qualcomm SnapDragon 8 gen 1) | 34015 |
| realme GT (Qualcomm SnapDragon 888) | 34977 |
| realme GT Neo 3 (Mediatek Dimensity 8100) | 35123 |
Advertentie
