Radeon HD 5770 vs. GeForce GTS 450
We schreven al dat de GeForce GTS 450 qua prijsstelling vrijwel identiek is aan de Radeon HD 5770. Tijd dus om de balans op te maken: in onderstaande tabel zie je alle benchmarks van beide kaarten nog eens overzichtelijk onder elkaar, met in de laatste kolom het procentuele verschil. Onderaan de tabel vind je de gemiddelde verschil: de GeForce GTS 450 blijkt in onze benchmarks gemiddeld 8,7% langzamer te zijn dan de Radeon HD 5770. Dat valt ons toch eigenlijk een klein beetje tegen...
Benchmark | Radeon HD 5770 | GeForce GTS 450 | GTS 450 vs. HD 5770 |
3DMark Vantage (Performance) | 11200 | 10566 | -5,7% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 No tesselation] | 31,1 fps | 30,2 fps | -2,9% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 Normal tesselation] | 22,0 fps | 22,1 fps | 0,5% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 Extreme tesselation] | 14,7 fps | 15,9 fps | 8,2% |
Far Cry 2 [1680x1050 - Very High] | 67,6 fps | 63,3 fps | -6,4% |
Far Cry 2 [1680x1050 4xAA - Very High] | 47,8 fps | 51,0 fps | 6,7% |
Far Cry 2 [1920x1080 - Very High] | 60,5 fps | 57,2 fps | -5,5% |
Far Cry 2 [1920x1080 4xAA - Very High] | 42,8 fps | 45,8 fps | 7,0% |
Resident Evil 5 [1680x1050 - High] | 76,6 fps | 72,3 fps | -5,6% |
Resident Evil 5 [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 72,1 fps | 63,6 fps | -11,8% |
Resident Evil 5 [1920x1080 - High] | 68,8 fps | 63,6 fps | -7,6% |
Resident Evil 5 [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 64,7 fps | 55,7 fps | -13,9% |
Street Fighter 4 [1680x1050 - High] | 151,5 fps | 139,6 fps | -7,9% |
Street Fighter 4 [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 72,7 fps | 101,8 fps | 40,0% |
Street Fighter 4 [1920x1080 - High] | 137,2 fps | 124,1 fps | -9,5% |
Street Fighter 4 [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 64,8 fps | 90,8 fps | 40,1% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1680x1050 - High] | 73,0 fps | 65,0 fps | -11,0% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 60,0 fps | 56,0 fps | -6,7% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1920x1080 - High] | 67,0 fps | 58,0 fps | -13,4% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 55,0 fps | 48,0 fps | -12,7% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1680x1050 Extreme] | 49,0 fps | 42,0 fps | -14,3% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1680x1050 4x AA Extreme] | 24,0 fps | 20,0 fps | -16,7% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1920x1080 Extreme] | 43,0 fps | 36,0 fps | -16,3% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1920x1080 4x AA Extreme] | 21,0 fps | 17,0 fps | -19,0% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1680x1050, Normal] | 23,4 fps | 20,7 fps | -11,5% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1680x1050, Very High] | 15,6 fps | 13,0 fps | -16,7% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1920x1080, Normal] | 19,9 fps | 18,3 fps | -8,0% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1920x1080, Very High] | 13,6 fps | 11,3 fps | -16,9% |
Just Cause 2 [1680x1050, Very High, 0x/16x] | 42,0 fps | 23,9 fps | -43,1% |
Just Cause 2 [1680x1050, Very High, 4x/16x] | 32,0 fps | 21,7 fps | -32,2% |
Just Cause 2 [1920x1080, Very High, 0x/16x] | 37,0 fps | 21,6 fps | -41,6% |
Just Cause 2 [1920x1080, Very High, 4x/16x] | 29,0 fps | 19,2 fps | -33,8% |
DiRT 2 [1680x1050, 0x AA - Ultra High] | 50,2 fps | 53,7 fps | 7,0% |
DiRT 2 [1680x1050, 4x AA - Ultra High] | 45,3 fps | 47,0 fps | 3,8% |
DiRT 2 [1920x1080, 0x AA - Ultra High] | 42,2 fps | 48,4 fps | 14,7% |
DiRT 2 [1920x1080, 4x AA - Ultra High] | 47,7 fps | 42,8 fps | -10,3% |
AvP DX11 [1680x1050, 0x AA - Very High] | 35,6 fps | 27,2 fps | -23,6% |
AvP DX11 [1680x1050, 4x AA - Very High] | 20,6 fps | 17,8 fps | -13,6% |
AvP DX11 [1920x1080, 0x AA - Very High] | 31,5 fps | 24,1 fps | -23,5% |
AvP DX11 [1920x1080, 4x AA - Very High] | 18,2 fps | 15,8 fps | -13,2% |
Gemiddeld | - | - | -8,7% |
Wat nu als nVidia haar prijzen de komende dagen nog scherper zu maken, waardoor de GTS 450 eigenlijk rechtstreeks tegenover de Radeon HD 5750 wordt gepositioneerd? Dan worden de rollen, zoals in onderstaande tabel te zien, exact omgedraaid: nVidia's nieuwe kaart blijkt dan 8,6% sneller. Opnieuw overigens niet bepaald een wereldschokkend verschil.
Benchmark | Radeon HD 5750 | GeForce GTS 450 | GTS 450 vs. HD 5750 |
3DMark Vantage (Performance) | 9241 | 10566 | 14,3% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 No tesselation] | 26,4 fps | 30,2 fps | 14,4% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 Normal tesselation] | 18,5 fps | 22,1 fps | 19,5% |
Heaven 2.0 DX11 [1920x1080 Extreme tesselation] | 12,4 fps | 15,9 fps | 28,2% |
Far Cry 2 [1680x1050 - Very High] | 55,9 fps | 63,3 fps | 13,2% |
Far Cry 2 [1680x1050 4xAA - Very High] | 41,9 fps | 51,0 fps | 21,7% |
Far Cry 2 [1920x1080 - Very High] | 50,5 fps | 57,2 fps | 13,3% |
Far Cry 2 [1920x1080 4xAA - Very High] | 37,4 fps | 45,8 fps | 22,5% |
Resident Evil 5 [1680x1050 - High] | 65,1 fps | 72,3 fps | 11,1% |
Resident Evil 5 [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 62,3 fps | 63,6 fps | 2,1% |
Resident Evil 5 [1920x1080 - High] | 58,2 fps | 63,6 fps | 9,3% |
Resident Evil 5 [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 55,8 fps | 55,7 fps | -0,2% |
Street Fighter 4 [1680x1050 - High] | 128,4 fps | 139,6 fps | 8,7% |
Street Fighter 4 [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 62,8 fps | 101,8 fps | 62,1% |
Street Fighter 4 [1920x1080 - High] | 116,3 fps | 124,1 fps | 6,7% |
Street Fighter 4 [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 55,9 fps | 90,8 fps | 62,4% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1680x1050 - High] | 51,0 fps | 65,0 fps | 27,5% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1680x1050 4xAA - High] | 44,0 fps | 56,0 fps | 27,3% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1920x1080 - High] | 46,0 fps | 58,0 fps | 26,1% |
Tom Clancy's HAWX DX10(.1) [1920x1080 4xAA - High] | 40,0 fps | 48,0 fps | 20,0% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1680x1050 Extreme] | 40,0 fps | 42,0 fps | 5,0% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1680x1050 4x AA Extreme] | 20,0 fps | 20,0 fps | 0,0% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1920x1080 Extreme] | 34,0 fps | 36,0 fps | 5,9% |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Call of Pripyat [1920x1080 4x AA Extreme] | 17,0 fps | 17,0 fps | 0,0% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1680x1050, Normal] | 21,3 fps | 20,7 fps | -2,8% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1680x1050, Very High] | 13,3 fps | 13,0 fps | -2,3% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1920x1080, Normal] | 19,0 fps | 18,3 fps | -3,7% |
Metro 2033 DX11 [1920x1080, Very High] | 11,3 fps | 11,3 fps | 0,0% |
Just Cause 2 [1680x1050, Very High, 0x/16x] | 35,3 fps | 23,9 fps | -32,3% |
Just Cause 2 [1680x1050, Very High, 4x/16x] | 28,1 fps | 21,7 fps | -22,8% |
Just Cause 2 [1920x1080, Very High, 0x/16x] | 31,6 fps | 21,6 fps | -31,6% |
Just Cause 2 [1920x1080, Very High, 4x/16x] | 25,2 fps | 19,2 fps | -23,8% |
DiRT 2 [1680x1050, 0x AA - Ultra High] | 46,6 fps | 53,7 fps | 15,2% |
DiRT 2 [1680x1050, 4x AA - Ultra High] | 43,4 fps | 47,0 fps | 8,3% |
DiRT 2 [1920x1080, 0x AA - Ultra High] | 43,3 fps | 48,4 fps | 11,8% |
DiRT 2 [1920x1080, 4x AA - Ultra High] | 40,5 fps | 42,8 fps | 5,7% |
AvP DX11 [1680x1050, 0x AA - Very High] | 28,2 fps | 27,2 fps | -3,5% |
AvP DX11 [1680x1050, 4x AA - Very High] | 17,1 fps | 17,8 fps | 4,1% |
AvP DX11 [1920x1080, 0x AA - Very High] | 25,0 fps | 24,1 fps | -3,6% |
AvP DX11 [1920x1080, 4x AA - Very High] | 15,2 fps | 15,8 fps | 3,9% |
Gemiddeld | - | - | 8,6% |
2 besproken producten
Vergelijk | Product | Prijs | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
MSI N450GTS Cyclone OC 1GB
|
Niet verkrijgbaar | |
![]() |
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
|
Niet verkrijgbaar |